TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2594] Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips

Open problem

Formalization work is available. The problem remains open.

Lean formalization attached · not verified
View research
Contents

Problem. For \(1\le n\le10000\), let \(G_n=C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) and \(I_n(z)=\sum_k i_{n,k}z^k\) be its independence polynomial. Is the coefficient sequence \((i_{n,k})_k\) log-concave for every such \(n\)?

Agent accessWork in ChatGPT

The agent reads this problem's research brief and asks you before it saves anything to TheoremDB.

Definitions and notation

1Context

This is a finite transfer-matrix sweep with reusable progress by terminal n. Exact work has reached n=40.

2Problem setup

Remark 1. i_{n,k} is the number of k-vertex independent sets in G_n.

Definition 1. C_4 square P_n denotes the Cartesian product C_4 with the n-vertex path.

3What counts as a solution

  • Give an exact transfer sweep through n=10000 with checksums, or report the first n and coefficient index where log-concavity fails.

1Status

Saved packet · July 25, 2026

What counts as a solution

Saved packet status (Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequence). Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked.[1]

1Packet records

3 records

Notes and companion material

Original intake status. UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-25. Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked. The checked sources do not settle the full acceptance condition.

  • The dated packet audit checked the exact title, parameter, and the terminology used by the cited primary literature.
  • The strongest recorded neighboring result is: Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked.
  • The controlled TheoremDB corpus was checked for equivalent formulations and contains no duplicate published target.

Recorded example 1. I_2(z)=1+8z+16z^2+8z^3+2z^4, which is log-concave and has nonreal roots.

Computational notes

  • Exact integer transfer matrices computed every I_n through n=40 and found no log-concavity violation. Numerical root calculation at n=2 found imaginary parts as large as approximately 1.71319, confirming that real-rootedness cannot prove this case.
How the 3 records connect
The overview places each record once. The relation list includes shared dependencies and names both ends of each link.

ProblemHard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips

All 2 recorded relations between these records and the problem

2See also

Contribute to this problem
Cite this problem statement

Cite the original sources separately.

Plain text
“Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips.” TheoremDB. P2594. Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab. https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2594
BibTeX
@misc{theoremdb-problem-648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab,
  title = {{Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips}},
  howpublished = {TheoremDB},
  note = {Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab},
  url = {https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2594}
}

This problem includes 3 records joined by 2 typed links, sourced from doi.org[1], current as of July 25, 2026.

1References

  1. Packet source. Neil J. Calkin and Herbert S. Wilf, “The Number of Independent Sets in a Grid Graph”. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60. DOI 10.1137/S089548019528993X. Neil J. Calkin and Herbert S. Wilf, The Number of Independent Sets in a Grid Graph, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60, Section 1; Maria Chudnovsky and Paul Seymour, The Roots of the Independence Polynomial of a Clawfree Graph, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357, DOI 10.1016/j.jctb.2006.06.001. ↗journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.Also cited at SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60, Section 1.Also cited at Exact transfer and replay certificate in hcc4-artifact-exact-transfer-sweep.Also cited at Inline Python 3 exact computation executed on 2026-07-25.For Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips: The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.Source named by the research packet.
  2. Maria Chudnovsky and Paul Seymour, “The roots of the independence polynomial of a clawfree graph”. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357. DOI 10.1016/j.jctb.2006.06.001. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357. ↗journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.For Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips: The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.

Original strip-family coefficient conjecture for the hard-core lattice gas.

Discussion

Loading discussion.

Add a comment

Report comment

Flag this problem

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.