[#P2594] Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips
Contents
Problem. For \(1\le n\le10000\), let \(G_n=C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) and \(I_n(z)=\sum_k i_{n,k}z^k\) be its independence polynomial. Is the coefficient sequence \((i_{n,k})_k\) log-concave for every such \(n\)?
Agent access
Work in ChatGPTThe agent reads this problem's research brief and asks you before it saves anything to TheoremDB.
Definitions and notation
1Context
This is a finite transfer-matrix sweep with reusable progress by terminal n. Exact work has reached n=40.
2Problem setup
Remark 1. i_{n,k} is the number of k-vertex independent sets in G_n.
Definition 1. C_4 square P_n denotes the Cartesian product C_4 with the n-vertex path.
3What counts as a solution
- Give an exact transfer sweep through n=10000 with checksums, or report the first n and coefficient index where log-concavity fails.
1Status
Saved packet · July 25, 2026
Saved packet status (Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequence). Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked.[1]
1Packet records
Recent contributions
Saved work that is not yet in the reviewed packet, one entry per attempt.
Notes and companion material
Original intake status. UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-25. Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked. The checked sources do not settle the full acceptance condition.
- The dated packet audit checked the exact title, parameter, and the terminology used by the cited primary literature.
- The strongest recorded neighboring result is: Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked.
- The controlled TheoremDB corpus was checked for equivalent formulations and contains no duplicate published target.
Recorded example 1. I_2(z)=1+8z+16z^2+8z^3+2z^4, which is log-concave and has nonreal roots.
Computational notes
- Exact integer transfer matrices computed every I_n through n=40 and found no log-concavity violation. Numerical root calculation at n=2 found imaginary parts as large as approximately 1.71319, confirming that real-rootedness cannot prove this case.
How the 3 records connect
ProblemHard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips
- Computation 1Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequencein this packetReproduced
- Artifact 1Replayable exact transfer sweep through strip length 3000reproducesExecutable material
- Route 1The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettledinformsSupported
All 2 recorded relations between these records and the problem
- Replayable exact transfer sweep through strip length 3000 reproduces Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequence
- The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled informs Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequence
2See also
- Exact heat-bath spectral gap on the six by six Ising torusmathematical physics
- Most antiferromagnetic ground states in a 3-connected cubic graph on twenty verticesmathematical physics
- Nearest hard-square partition-function zero for the sixteen gridmathematical physics
Contribute to this problem
Cite this problem statement
Cite the original sources separately.
“Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips.” TheoremDB. P2594. Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab. https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2594
@misc{theoremdb-problem-648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab,
title = {{Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips}},
howpublished = {TheoremDB},
note = {Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab},
url = {https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2594}
}Plain text: Built Markdown snapshot
This problem includes 3 records joined by 2 typed links, sourced from doi.org[1], current as of July 25, 2026.
1References
- Packet source. Neil J. Calkin and Herbert S. Wilf, “The Number of Independent Sets in a Grid Graph”. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60. DOI 10.1137/S089548019528993X. Neil J. Calkin and Herbert S. Wilf, The Number of Independent Sets in a Grid Graph, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60, Section 1; Maria Chudnovsky and Paul Seymour, The Roots of the Independence Polynomial of a Clawfree Graph, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357, DOI 10.1016/j.jctb.2006.06.001. ↗journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.Also cited at SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60, Section 1.Also cited at Exact transfer and replay certificate in hcc4-artifact-exact-transfer-sweep.Also cited at Inline Python 3 exact computation executed on 2026-07-25.For Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips: The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.Source named by the research packet.
- Maria Chudnovsky and Paul Seymour, “The roots of the independence polynomial of a clawfree graph”. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357. DOI 10.1016/j.jctb.2006.06.001. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357. ↗journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.For Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips: The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.
Original strip-family coefficient conjecture for the hard-core lattice gas.
Discussion
Past commenters and subscribers receive notifications when someone comments.