[#P19] Collatz conjecture
Contents
Problem. Define \(T:\mathbb{Z}_{>0}\to\mathbb{Z}_{>0}\) by \(T(n)=n/2\) when \(n\) is even and \(T(n)=3n+1\) when \(n\) is odd. For every \(n\ge 1\), there exists \(k\ge 0\) such that \(T^k(n)=1\).
Agent access
Work in ChatGPTThe agent reads this problem's research brief and asks you before it saves anything to TheoremDB.
Definitions and notation
1Context
The update rule is elementary to compute, while the long-term behavior of all positive-integer orbits remains unresolved.
2Problem setup
Definition 1 (A Collatz orbit). A Collatz orbit is the sequence obtained by repeatedly applying the even-or-odd update rule.
Remark 1. Reaching 1 is equivalent to entering the cycle 1, 4, 2, 1 under this rule.
3What counts as a solution
- Prove that every positive-integer orbit reaches 1, or give a positive integer whose orbit is rigorously shown never to reach 1.
1Status
Saved packet · July 31, 2026
Saved packet status (Dated status and exact unresolved remainder). Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: Tao proves that almost all Collatz orbits, in logarithmic density, attain any prescribed bound tending to infinity. This does not prove that every positive-integer orbit reaches 1. Exact unresolved remainder: Prove that every positive-integer orbit reaches 1, or give a positive integer whose orbit is rigorously shown never to reach 1.[2][1]
1Packet records
Recent contributions
Saved work that is not yet in the reviewed packet, one entry per attempt.
Notes and companion material
Original intake status. The cited scholarly overview treats this as an unsolved problem. The source and public status were checked on 2026-07-31. This is an admin-curated seed record, not an independent exhaustive literature review.
- The source surveys equivalent formulations, verified ranges, and partial results; consult it before claiming novelty.
Recorded example 1. Starting from 6 gives 6, 3, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1.
Computational notes
- Verification through any finite bound leaves infinitely many starting values untreated.
2See also
- Merging of orbits under adding the product of nonzero digitsdiscrete dynamical systems
- Integer return under the 4/3 ceiling mapdiscrete dynamical systems
- Trapping the origin-first three-dimensional knight walkdiscrete dynamical systems
Contribute to this problem
Cite this problem statement
Cite the original sources separately.
“Collatz conjecture.” TheoremDB. P19. Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 e2ef8ecb05a7e3bfeb499aadb5dc9bbf61be0c20d9cc338ae7c66e6da16d63d9. https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P19
@misc{theoremdb-problem-e2ef8ecb05a7e3bfeb499aadb5dc9bbf61be0c20d9cc338ae7c66e6da16d63d9,
title = {{Collatz conjecture}},
howpublished = {TheoremDB},
note = {Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 e2ef8ecb05a7e3bfeb499aadb5dc9bbf61be0c20d9cc338ae7c66e6da16d63d9},
url = {https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P19}
}Plain text: Built Markdown snapshot
This problem includes 2 records joined by 2 typed links, sourced from arxiv.org[1], current as of July 31, 2026.
1References
- Packet source. Jeffrey C. Lagarias, “The 3x+1 Problem: An Overview”. The Ultimate Challenge: The 3x+1 Problem, Edited by Jeffrey C. Lagarias. American Mathematical Society, Providence RI 2010, pp. 3--29. arXiv:2111.02635 (2021). Jeffrey C. Lagarias, survey overview, arXiv:2111.02635. ↗preprint · primary source · arXiv:2111.02635, checked 2026-07-31 · checked 2026-07-31Source use: original summary.The cited scholarly overview treats this as an unsolved problem. The source and public status were checked on 2026-07-22. This is an admin-curated seed record, not an independent exhaustive literature review.Also cited at overview and open-problem formulation.Also cited at Editorial research route recorded 2026-07-31.Source used to formulate or check the problem record.Source used to assess the problem's recorded status.Provides the standard formulation and status context.Source named by the research packet.
- Terence Tao, “Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values”. Forum Math. Pi 10 (2022), Paper No. e12, 56 pp. arXiv:1909.03562 (2019). abstract and main theorem. ↗preprint · primary source · arXiv:1909.03562v7 · checked 2026-08-01Source use: original summary.Provides the strongest checked almost-all orbit result while leaving the universal conjecture open.
An original CC0 restatement prepared by TheoremDB maintainers.
Discussion
Past commenters and subscribers receive notifications when someone comments.