TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR342

R342Recorded attempt

Prove the conjecture by induction through alpha-labelings

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Alpha-labelings compose, so an induction that keeps one would close the conjecture. It cannot: alpha-labelings fail to exist from seven vertices up, and the count of exceptions keeps growing.

The recorded result has been reproduced within its stated scope. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.

Attempt outcome: failed as complete proof

Recorded scope: tested against every tree on at most 15 vertices

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "tested against every tree on at most 15 vertices",
  "bounds": {
    "n": {
      "max": 15
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": true
}

Originating problem: Graceful tree conjecture

Recorded relationships: Graceful tree conjecture

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Prove the conjecture by induction through alpha-labelings
Record type
attempt
Stored status
failed_as_complete_proof
Evidence grade
reproduced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "tested against every tree on at most 15 vertices", "bounds": { "n": { "max": 15 } }, "exhaustive": true }
Linked research record IDs
graceful-tree-conjecture

Work and source credit

Recorded action

No action description supplied.

Authored result summary

Alpha-labelings compose, so an induction that keeps one would close the conjecture. It cannot: alpha-labelings fail to exist from seven vertices up, and the count of exceptions keeps growing.

Reported outcome

No separate outcome supplied.

Recorded status

failed_as_complete_proof

Recorded evidence grade

reproduced

Recorded scope
Read complete recorded scope

{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "tested against every tree on at most 15 vertices", "bounds": { "n": { "max": 15 } }, "exhaustive": true }

This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.

Recognized embedded source files (0)

This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.

The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.

2Authored explanation

The route is attractive because alpha-labelings, unlike graceful labelings in general, survive the natural joins. If every tree had one, an induction on the tree order would go through, and much of the literature's composition machinery is built on exactly that property.

The route cannot be completed. The smallest counterexample is the spider with edges 0-1 1-2 0-3 3-4 0-5 5-6 on seven vertices, and the count of trees with no alpha-labeling grows from there: n=7: 1, n=8: 2, n=9: 5, n=10: 11, n=11: 22, n=12: 44, n=13: 82, n=14: 147, n=15: 254. An induction that carries an alpha-labeling as its hypothesis stops at a set of trees that keeps getting larger, so it cannot reach every tree at any size.

One qualifier, since it points at what the route is still good for. Those trees are a falling share of all trees, 10.6% at n=9 down to 3.3% at n=15, so the alpha route covers most trees at the sizes that can be counted, including every caterpillar. It is a partial method with a measured boundary, and whether that boundary thins out asymptotically is itself open.

3Where it stops

alpha-labelings do not exist for all trees

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

4Outcome

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15

5What was measured

Alpha free share peak

n9percent10.6%

6How it connects

Attempts

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R342",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "gtc-attempt-alpha-induction",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "Prove the conjecture by induction through alpha-labelings",
  "summary": "Alpha-labelings compose, so an induction that keeps one would close the conjecture. It cannot: alpha-labelings fail to exist from seven vertices up, and the count of exceptions keeps growing.",
  "relevance": "For Graceful tree conjecture, record gtc-attempt-alpha-induction (“Prove the conjecture by induction through alpha-labelings”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Alpha-labelings compose, so an induction that keeps one would close the conjecture.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The route is attractive because alpha-labelings, unlike graceful labelings in general, survive the natural joins. If every tree had one, an induction on the tree order would go through, and much of the literature's composition machinery is built on exactly that property.\n\nThe route cannot be completed. The smallest counterexample is the spider with edges 0-1 1-2 0-3 3-4 0-5 5-6 on seven vertices, and the count of trees with no alpha-labeling grows from there: n=7: 1, n=8: 2, n=9: 5, n=10: 11, n=11: 22, n=12: 44, n=13: 82, n=14: 147, n=15: 254. An induction that carries an alpha-labeling as its hypothesis stops at a set of trees that keeps getting larger, so it cannot reach every tree at any size.\n\nOne qualifier, since it points at what the route is still good for. Those trees are a falling share of all trees, 10.6% at n=9 down to 3.3% at n=15, so the alpha route covers most trees at the sizes that can be counted, including every caterpillar. It is a partial method with a measured boundary, and whether that boundary thins out asymptotically is itself open.",
  "status": "failed_as_complete_proof",
  "evidence_grade": "reproduced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "tested against every tree on at most 15 vertices",
    "bounds": {
      "n": {
        "max": 15
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": true
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1564",
      "locator": "research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1564",
    "locator": "research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R347",
      "title": "The smallest tree with no alpha-labeling has seven vertices",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "constrains",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R346",
      "title": "Trees with no alpha-labeling: the count doubles, the share peaks and falls",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "constrains",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "graceful-tree-conjecture",
      "title": "Graceful tree conjecture",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "attempts",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "graceful-tree-conjecture",
      "title": "graceful tree conjecture",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

8Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.