TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR352

R352Reproduced evidence

Exhaustive search cost multiplies by about 4.6 per vertex

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Search nodes per size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531. Cost grows by a factor of 4.6 per vertex while the tree count grows by 2.4.

The recorded result has been reproduced within its stated scope.

Recorded status: reproduced

Recorded scope: search cost measured on trees of 10 to 15 vertices

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "search cost measured on trees of 10 to 15 vertices",
  "bounds": {
    "n": {
      "max": 15,
      "min": 10
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": true
}

Originating problem: Graceful tree conjecture

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Exhaustive search cost multiplies by about 4.6 per vertex
Record type
claim
Stored status
reproduced
Evidence grade
reproduced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "search cost measured on trees of 10 to 15 vertices", "bounds": { "n": { "max": 15, "min": 10 } }, "exhaustive": true }

2Authored explanation

Backtracking nodes used by the graceful search, by tree size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531.

Over that range the node count grows by 4.6 per vertex (the last single step is 6.5), against a tree-count growth of 2.4. The per-tree cost is rising as well as the number of trees.

Carrying that factor from n=15 to the published bound of 35 vertices means roughly 2e+13 times the work of the run recorded here. A plain exhaustive sweep does not reach that bound, which is consistent with the published verification having used constraint propagation and randomized search. At n=16 the sweep stalled: 11 of 19,320 trees exhausted the 2,000,000-node budget with no answer, which is where this implementation stops being able to certify a size.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15

4What was measured

Search nodes by n

1021334105376757397876792,013108,2641128,4621297,71013587,455142,503,4951516,305,5311677,548,344

5How it connects

Evidenced by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R352",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "gtc-claim-search-cost",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Exhaustive search cost multiplies by about 4.6 per vertex",
  "summary": "Search nodes per size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531. Cost grows by a factor of 4.6 per vertex while the tree count grows by 2.4.",
  "relevance": "For Graceful tree conjecture, record gtc-claim-search-cost (“Exhaustive search cost multiplies by about 4.6 per vertex”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Search nodes per size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Backtracking nodes used by the graceful search, by tree size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531.\n\nOver that range the node count grows by 4.6 per vertex (the last single step is 6.5), against a tree-count growth of 2.4. The per-tree cost is rising as well as the number of trees.\n\nCarrying that factor from n=15 to the published bound of 35 vertices means roughly 2e+13 times the work of the run recorded here. A plain exhaustive sweep does not reach that bound, which is consistent with the published verification having used constraint propagation and randomized search. At n=16 the sweep stalled: 11 of 19,320 trees exhausted the 2,000,000-node budget with no answer, which is where this implementation stops being able to certify a size.",
  "status": "reproduced",
  "evidence_grade": "reproduced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "search cost measured on trees of 10 to 15 vertices",
    "bounds": {
      "n": {
        "max": 15,
        "min": 10
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": true
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1564",
      "locator": "research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1564",
    "locator": "research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R344",
      "title": "Settle the conjecture by extending exhaustive verification",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "constrains",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R341",
      "title": "Search cost by tree size",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "graceful-tree-conjecture",
      "title": "graceful tree conjecture",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.