Problem packetResearch packetR350
Trees of diameter at most five are graceful
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: established
Recorded scope: trees of diameter at most five, of any size
Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
"kind": "family",
"statement": "trees of diameter at most five, of any size",
"family": "diameter at most five"
}Originating problem: Graceful tree conjecture
Recorded relationships: Graceful tree conjecture
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Trees of diameter at most five are graceful
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- established
- Evidence grade
- sourced
- Recorded scope data
- { "kind": "family", "statement": "trees of diameter at most five, of any size", "family": "diameter at most five" }
- Linked research record IDs
- graceful-tree-conjecture
2Authored explanation
Diameters up to four follow from earlier constructions; diameter five is the substantial case. The proof is a construction by cases on the shape of the central path. It stops where the cases stop, which is why diameter six has needed separate work.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: www.combinatorics.org ↗, Gallian, Dynamic Survey of Graph Labeling, Hrncar and Haviar 2001
4How it connects
Supports
- problem
Used by
- attempt
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R350",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "gtc-claim-diameter-five",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Trees of diameter at most five are graceful",
"summary": "The diameter ladder is settled through five, by Hrncar and Haviar for the diameter-five case.",
"relevance": "For Graceful tree conjecture, record gtc-claim-diameter-five (“Trees of diameter at most five are graceful”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The diameter ladder is settled through five, by Hrncar and Haviar for the diameter-five case.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Diameters up to four follow from earlier constructions; diameter five is the substantial case. The proof is a construction by cases on the shape of the central path. It stops where the cases stop, which is why diameter six has needed separate work.",
"status": "established",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": {
"kind": "family",
"statement": "trees of diameter at most five, of any size",
"family": "diameter at most five"
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/DS6",
"locator": "Gallian, Dynamic Survey of Graph Labeling, Hrncar and Haviar 2001"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/DS6",
"locator": "Gallian, Dynamic Survey of Graph Labeling, Hrncar and Haviar 2001"
},
"models": [],
"continuation": null,
"relations": [
{
"slug": "graceful-tree-conjecture",
"title": "Graceful tree conjecture",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "supports",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "R343",
"title": "Push the diameter ladder from five to six",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "uses",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "graceful-tree-conjecture",
"title": "graceful tree conjecture",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}6Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.